i just want to get the point across, so the word gets out.

i need to reiterate that i post a lot at rt, al jazeera and other global intersections. that's how i'm getting traffic from across the world.

unfortunately, the google algorithms are interpreting that as bought views, and while, again, i'll state that buying views wouldn't get me anything besides a lot of confused sheep, it's obvious that i'm not buying 4 views from south korea or whatever else.

what's setting the trigger off is the ratio. less than half of my views over the year are from the united states (although us + uk + can make up a bit more than half). according to google's filters, that's impossible without buying views.

and i claim that's blatantly racist.

what's going to happen over time is that google is going to slowly delete most of these views - most zealously the ones from southeast asia, russia, the middle east and africa.

what has to happen is that youtube needs to change how it tries to catch bought views, because what it's doing right now is just erasing 80% of the planet from it's watch stats.

more to the point, i guess, is that i'm *not* advertising to an american-centric audience, but largely to one outside the united states. my views would not be popular in that country.

....and, i mean, i'm not even from the united states. it's sort of ridiculous to expect me to get mostly american traffic when i neither live there nor am interested in their culture, but rather rant a whole lot about how evil they are.

google is notoriously difficult to contact, but they do react to negative information when they hear it, so talk amongst yourselves. it'll get back to them.

the reality is that a canadian news analyst commenting heavily over global news sources should expect to generate a global audience, and google has their head in their ass about it if their algorithm interprets that as fraudulent due to the views being less than 50% american.

i need to stop thinking about it, though. it really doesn't matter. it's just pissing me off on the principle of it.

i always have a helluva time mixing down power chords because i want a wall of sound through a complicated mess of multiple distortions, each mixed to hone in on it's own frequency. i can usually settle for a basic bass/mid/treble split, through three differently equalized distortions.

it took me all night to get those three tracks set up, but i think it's done. i'll have to double check in the morning. needs time to set.

so, i'm done for the night. i should hopefully be able to start on some final overdubs tomorrow.

getting there.

i'm going to try a different approach in the mix. i spent years and years working in cool edit. not audition. and not the multitrack version. just basic, audacity style cool edit. what i'd do is i'd just paste tracks on top of each other. it's a subtle difference in algorithm between "mixing" and "synthesizing". it's this production trick that makes some of my ambient pieces sound so thick and lush through a set of good headphones.

the reality is just that it was a function of what i had available. i couldn't run multitrack software well with the hardware i had, and my four-track tape recorder was just too noisy for me. so, if i wanted 8 or 16 or more tracks, that was the only way to really do it.

when i finally pried myself away from this and forced myself to figure out a modern recording interface, i kind of lost the open intuition of the wave editor. when you use the recording studio as a creative tool, the linear nature of recording into a wave editor v building tracks up in the normal way affects the construction process. there's this absolute free reign in overdubs, because you're zooming in to a specific time coordinate and pasting it over, rather than dealing with this structure broken into bars and notes. and, if an idea extends beyond it's bounds, the bounds merely extend the idea; that's how six minute tracks became half hour ones.

i'll probably never break with that entirely. if you listen to the segues in the first movement of the proverbs symphony, you can hear that they're cut up and fucked with. i'm likely to get more freaky with this, not less freaky with it.

the drawback of working in linear editors is that it's mostly destructive, in the sense that it's difficult to go back to a previous point in time unless you take very close notes and are sort of neurotic about putting everything aside, incrementally. that's the reason i forced myself to get out of it.

so, i don't really want to go back to that, but i do want to implement some open editing strategies into the standard multitrack recording approach. all the time i spent listening to the old stuff over the last few months has me remembering how useful it can be in getting certain raw sounds and effects across.

so, i'm going to start taking some of the sounds out, warping them in editors, and pasting them back in where they were. that will allow me to utilize some of those synthesis techniques without losing the flexibility of cubase.

i just hope it actually sounds the way i expect it to. if not, the good old wave editor could get a bit of a return to heavier and more central usage.

that being said, i'm not dealing with 8s or 16s or even 32s anymore. i just passed 70 tracks. it'll be over 100 when i'm done, i'm sure. that's on a piece under ten minutes and is about average over the last little while.

and it's not hard to understand why it takes so long, when i explain it like that i guess. that's not five people doing 100 tracks in parallel, it's one person slowly building up 100 tracks over ten minutes. and, in a longer piece of 20-30 minutes, that's pushing more like 300.

the older editor-based stuff would rarely get over 100 tracks on a half hour piece, although i'd bet a few got close to it. i had real limitations on hard drive space. remember when 20 gb was a big hard drive? it didn't seem so big, not even then. but, now there's really no limits...and i'm not about to impose artificial ones.

i lost a few days due to a nasty neck ache that required a lot of sleeping. i'm still not really clear on what happened, but i've narrowed it down to either:

a) i picked up a virus from not using soap to wash my hands while making eggs. we all do this, because we're all lazy. i need to be more careful.

b) multiple sclerosis. this isn't random. i've been hearing about being high risk since i was a toddler, and i do get weird facial tics and random muscle spasms rather regularly. where the pain is (where my spine meets my brain) could very well be a lesion. but, if true, existing medical science couldn't actually do anything about it except waste a lot of my time. so, whatever. it's mostly gone away. good enough for now....

i'm feeling alert enough at this point to get back to it tonight. i think i'm still on course to finish the track by the first.

you know, something else that happened right before my back went up in flames was that i switched from folgers to maxwell house. and i drink around a pot of extremely strong coffee a day, so it's not outside the realm of possibility. pot two is coming up, we'll have to see how that works out...

but, what i wanted to post was this:

<phil hartman>

MAXWELL HOUSE! COFFEE SO STRONG, IT WILL MAKE YOUR NECK HURT SO BADLY, THAT YOU'LL BE COMPLETELY CONVINCED YOU HAVE M.S.

</phil hartman>

also, why isn't there a "bill clinton killed phil hartman" conspiracy theory?

weird that i can hear this tonight but couldn't hear it last night or the night before. it's richie hawtin, specifically. he'll be on another hour.

at first, i thought it was a house party, so i took a walk around the neighbourhood planning to crash it. yeah, i'll do that. well, listen, if you're going to turn the music up loud enough that i can hear it in my apartment, i'll interpret that as an invite; if i'm listening to your music anyways, i'd like to come in and dance, thank you.

but, as i started walking around, i started realizing it was coming from a rather large distance away because i could hear cheering in the background. it was the cheering that dissuaded me; must be a hefty cover. the bass seemed rather close, though. i guess it was roaring in between the houses...

i also realized that the dj actually wasn't very interesting, and it wasn't worth stumbling around trying to find.

i assumed it was probably the casino in downtown windsor, not across the river in detroit. that is really ridiculously loud....

http://www.movement.us/

yeah. i'll be ok. hopefully it goes away soon, though.

it hasn't really improved, but i've gotten used to it. also, i'm developing a sore throat, which leads me to conclude that i've picked up a virus. this is pretty intense for the flu, though....

...and the truth is the only vector i can conceive of over the last week would be those eggs. so, bird flu? maybe....

i'll see what i feel like when the sun comes up.

my neck needs rest, but my brain is wide awake. so, read.

i'm finding myself in far greater agreement with hobbes than i ever thought i would be, and am actually seeing him produce a lot of the same sorts of arguments i'm always throwing at ancaps. hobbes would agree that a society based around markets and contracts would require a state to enforce those markets and contracts, rendering the vision of classical liberalism (today pushed by anarcho-capitalists) a sort of contradiction in terms - precisely agreeing with myself and other anarchists, who don't think anarchy and capitalism are compatible with each other.

of course, hobbes would not conclude that markets and contracts (and property and currency) should be abolished, as i would. instead, he'd argue in favour of a totalitarian state that forces actors to carry out their promises.

but i'm a little surprised how much i'm actually identifying with somebody that's always been presented to me as the exact opposite of everything i've ever believed in or stood for.

these are the existing stats on my top video. i've pointed out repeatedly that buying views would not help me, due to the fact that i'm an abstract artist and have no commercial potential or potential to herd a flock. but these stats make it clear they aren't bought. you'd think it would make more sense to run it against poisson or something (perhaps some research is necessary to get the right distribution, poisson strikes me as useful in finding the rare event of a full play) to determine if the data fits a reasonable shape, rather than to just be all racist about it.

it's that one algerian hit i want, not the hundreds of dumb americans that get confused after 0:07. i'd rather they delete the american hits, and let me keep the algerian one.

we'll have to see what they do or don't do with this, but it seems like all those hits outside of the first world - in turkey and south africa and elsewhere - will be declared fake.

because they don't actually exist.

i'm noticing that the youtube algorithm is basically racist, in that it rejects any hits from outside of the "first world".

sorry, white men from california. i post regularly on videos discussing global affairs. those hits from russia are legit.

in your world, nobody in russia actually uses the internet, i guess.

i ultimately don't really care. youtube views are not a meaningful currency to an obscure artist that is about substance over style. like anybody else, it makes sense for me to maximize the potential audience. but, i'd rather have one quality hit than ten thousand people that listen for five seconds. see, the unfortunate reality, though, is that the latter is necessary to get the former.

but, people should be aware that youtube isn't actually really cracking down on fake hits, it's just applying a type of racial profiling, and it's going to negatively affect people with an actual global reach, by turning audiences outside of the first world into non-entities.

in a sense, it's sort of what we all already knew: the tech industry doesn't think the rest of the world actually exists.

ouch.

neck is very stiff. has me paranoid about paralysis. but i'm hoping i just leaned on it the wrong way. will give it a few hours to heal before i freak out.

i took a break from mixing this morning to make some eggs, which gave me some heartburn and forced me to lie down. i woke up a few hours later barely able to move, with difficulty swallowing & etc.

see, it's been suggested to me more than once that i'm high risk for developing MS. i've had these periodic facial tics for as long as i can remember, but it's on the other side of the neck. i'm a little worried that something "broke" on the other side.

for now, i'm going to try to breathe slowly and just basically not move for a few hours.

so, i've become convinced that i will eventually snap my own sternum in the process of stretching, the blood splinters will travel to my heart and i'll die on the floor in a pool of my own blood. things are constantly snapping in there. it's just a matter of time.

but i can't just not stretch. no, really. try it some time. nobody can accomplish this task.

so, i've resigned myself to my own frailty, and patiently await the outcome.

hey, i always said i wouldn't make it to 25.

i was shocked when i made it to 30.

i suppose my track record on this prediction is not good, but i consider it exceedingly unlikely that i'll get to 40.

in some imaginary state of nature that never actually existed, i would have been eaten by lions before i turned ten. no, really, i would have. so, i'm already way ahead, thanks to the technology.

better to quit when i'm ahead. wait.

uploading first movement (demo) to soundcloud

this is the guitar run through of the first movement of the proverbs symphony, as it was initially written (and demoed in early 2007). note that this version is less than seven minutes and is written to be performed live, whereas the completed movement is over seventeen minutes and would be impossible to reproduce without an orchestra of guitarists.

https://soundcloud.com/deathtokoalas/proverbs-symphony-movement-1-winter-2007

...and the memories come back: it was written as a synth-guitar part, in the sense of being meant to be played over a keyboard. so, i'll have to put the sequencer section back in.

that means i'm moving to a temporary mixing stage for the day. the remainder of the track is basically production & vocals. that may mean adding some extra tracks, but it's flourishes.

i might have it done by the weekend. the 1st, for sure. the next track is going to be a process as well, before i rapidly shoot through the rest of '01.

the last prewritten section isn't playable. i'd have to split it into multiple tracks, then use weird tunings on all of them.

the awkward moment when you realize you read your own sheet music wrong.

hey, it was 15 years ago.

uploading the lost symphony to soundcloud

when finally completed, the trivial group sequence will consist of a 2-cd arranged in four thematically linked "symphonies", of which two are currently complete and one is partly complete. this is a live play through of the second half of the third piece and the entirety of the fourth.

this was written over 2004 and yet has not been recorded in any significant form. i went through a long period from '04 to '07 where i was convinced this piece (and some others i was writing at the time) required a drummer and refused to record until i could find one. i couldn't find one, which put me into a fit of depression and led to writers block & etc. eventually, i just bought an electronic kit with the goal of playing it myself.

however, i then skipped over it because i felt i was dragging on the relationship it was about on just a bit too far. time to move on, kind of thing. it had outlived it's relevance, without making it to track.

i'll be recording this (finally) over the upcoming months. for now, here's a messy demo of it.

https://soundcloud.com/deathtokoalas/the-lost-symphony

done for the night.

day.

what is time?

the rhythm parts are now almost done. i've been bouncing around between all these weird tunings...

...but the last rhythm sections are connected to some acoustic parts, which should be done tomorrow.

will have to change the strings and etc in the morning.

afternoon.

i also need to record some live drums, somehow. then: leads, vocals, production. getting there...

seems like somebody had an urge to do a townsend impersonation

i'm not picky about acoustics. it's the percussive sound i want, i can always put some reverb on it. so i'll get a cheap one...

i could always try to reglue it, but the split looks messy.

gah. on second thought, it looks like the head has been glued back together.

which may provide an answer to the question of where my uncased guitars went.

the glue job was weak, neck is going to crack in time so i should get these tracks down immediately...

my acoustic works! yay!

i was worried about it for a long time, because it seemed like i had just demoed the intonation by dragging it across the country in a canadian spring. going from ottawa to new brunswick to manitoba to alberta to bc to alberta and back to ontario, across rainforests and deserts and mountains, from cold to hot, from dry to damp, and in a little nylon gig case the whole time, and in a short amount of time, seemed to have left it in an unplayable state. it was in the unfortunate state of being unable to produce an E that sounded the same across different strings, no matter how closely i tuned it.

but, i changed the nut on it and left it in a weird string configuration - i had a heavy gauge in the D position, and a light gauge in the G position - and then got evicted and completely forgot about it, as it sat in a basement, alone, for two years.

i don't remember exactly what i was thinking, but whatever intuition i had about warping it back into shape seems to have worked, because it's as good as new now.

i really missed having a playable acoustic. things are all slowly coming into place...

another weird thing: i cut the strings off with a pair of electrical pliers that are probably older than i am and, for all i know, may have even belonged to my grandfather. what's weird about it is that it's the same set of pliers i used to use to cut the strings on the first acoustics i played with when i was roughly ten years old.

uploading proverbs demos to soundcloud

this is a very early (july 31, 2005), no effects demo of the second & third movements (reversed). there are a few flourishes, both gained & lost.

https://soundcloud.com/deathtokoalas/proverbs-symphony-movements-3-2-summer-2005 

i think we've all heard rumours of just how widespread the "buy fans" industry is on social media, but on soundcloud they've taken it to a different level. i'm actually getting spammed to buy likes, and i can't believe that's possible without some help from soundcloud.

well, the business models on these sites are notoriously bad. could they make money by selling likes? it might be the only way they're making money.

as mentioned, i've really tried to avoid soundcloud. i'm using it to hold lo-fi demos. i'd never upload anything finished there...

this is what i got spammed with:

https://soundcloud.com/jake_pk

open spamming suggests to me that the industry is working in plain view.

i mean, i'd never buy likes. it's pathetic. a non-starter. but it's actually not something that would help me either, as i'm more interesting when i'm obscure. if we want to talk venn diagrams, my intersection with popular culture is pretty much zero. it doesn't really matter how much i spend on buying likes or other kind of bullshit promo because what i'm creating is inherently revolting to anybody with a follower mindset. to me, buying likes is like trying to market tampons to teenage boys......it's floating a product that is entirely useless to that market.

i'd go so far as to argue that the type of person that is going to listen to my art is almost certainly going to use ad blocking software.

second section of guitar overdubs is done. after all the fucking around, i stuck with less is more, but i'm going to convert one of the counter-melodies into a vocal part, instead.

vocals? yeah. i think i'm going to get back to them, but generally release the material in instrumental form, as well. i know what it's like to enjoy a piece of music and despise the singer, so i'll provide that option.

i do consider myself handy enough with words, but i'm not a poet and have never aspired to be one. for all my rambling about the sanctity of art for art's sake, i'm pretty harsh on poetry as being pretty much useless. see, it strikes me either as a pretty base and unimaginative form of expression or as the height of pretension, with almost no middle ground. i'm more interested in observational writing.

but, maybe observational writing is sort of like poetry and i'm just being semantic. maybe it's actually the middle ground i seek. this could go around in circles for a while, so i'll be clear on the line i'm drawing; you can attach that line to different concepts as you see fit. the difference is in getting an idea across vs mentally masturbating around the language of a turn of phrase. the more obfuscated and layered your statement is, the less valuable the statement becomes. development is key in getting a point across, but the point is getting across the point, and i like to be as clear and straight to it as i can be. if you need a book to explain your poem, you've failed at communicating a message and might as well be just jerking off in the corner by yourself.

to me, this whole dialogue is a big part of what punk rock is really about.

it's not really a break. i've always used vocals, i've just jumped from using them liberally to using them sporadically, and it was mostly because i just didn't have anything i wanted to get across in the medium. if i had something to say, i would - and did. i actually think i can trace this decision back to about '06 or so, meaning it was only really in the early mid 00s that i mostly shunned vocals (although, again, it was never total). it's just that i have very little completed work to show for myself since '05.

anyways.

systems collapse is being stuck in the middle of an alley closing in on all sides. so, let the factories turn to rust and let the buildings fall apart. if you need me, i'll be rocking out with the horn section...

deathtokoalas
i still remember sitting hunched over on my bed when i was fourteen and fifteen and sixteen and seventeen, transcribing soundgarden tabs to standard tuning and wrenching my hands inside out actually playing them. this one's in standard tuning. burden in my hand was one i remember being particularly weird to play. that might be the best practice you can give a kid to get their hands going around.

with fell on black days, it was that off the wall solo (and those harmonies at the end) that was fun to play along with, because the chemistry between kim and chris on the track is so deep that it gets across through a mass manufactured tape played on a cheap ghettoblaster. there's only maybe two or three songs that i know of like this, where you can really channel the emotion of the track just by playing along with it.

the guitar just turns into this electrified monster, and the guitar trance suddenly takes over.

(deleted post) 

deathtokoalas
kim's stuff isn't that hard to learn, really, if you're coming into it with enough dexterity. it's a specific style, you just need to get your fingers and mind into it and most of it comes out pretty naturally because it's mostly just all tremoloing through pentatonics. i always wondered if that wonky guild of his was initially a way to get a zappaesque sg thing going on.

but it's a lot of fun to play.

(deleted post) 

deathtokoalas
something i used to do back in the day was just run chromatically up and down the neck. i spent a brief period trying to be an impressionist jazz punk guitar teacher by just throwing all the theory out the window and teaching kids to work directly with semitone intervals. the idea was to warp their brains into rejecting western tonality and understanding the instrument as a kind of matrix of notes, in which they could build their own patterns.

none of the kids lasted long, but they did get their fingers moving quickly. see, to me, that's the important thing - being able to move your fingers with enough control to be able to create what you hear in your head.

so, that helps. it's dry, though. kim would throw his beer at me, call me a wanker and tell me to go listen to steve vai. of course, i agree with him to a large extent. i kind of don't feel like soundgarden was meant to be studied.

but it does work.

Huzaifa Ahmed
dude what's wrong with koalas?

deathtokoalas
koalas need to be destroyed due to their cuteness.

J.C. Gleason
Aren't the majority of Soundgarden songs in drop D? I know that Black Hole Sun,  Birth Ritual and Outshined are but I don't know.

deathtokoalas
soundgarden used alternate tunings in general, not just dropped d, although the low e was in fact often dropped down a little (sometimes down to c). a lot of the interesting voicings they came up with came from using open tunings.

J.C. Gleason
Really? Huh, you learn something new everyday.

deathtokoalas
yeah. the open tunings were a genre marker of alt rock in the 80s, but are really pretty standard through the history of folk rock.

Jackson P.
Black Hole Sun isn't in drop D....

deathtokoalas
i'm pretty sure it is, actually. it's been a long time, though.

this song isn't, though.

Jackson P.
Yeah you're right. But it's harder to play in drop d than whatever I originally learned IMO.

And yes, this is just in standard. Rather easy song as well.

Could've very well done without that last guitar solo though :/

deathtokoalas
bah. it's the solo that's the fun part to play....

J.C. Gleason
Not necessarily.

deathtokoalas
iirc, black hole sun is in drop-d specifically because it uses the lower two notes. you'd have to transpose it up at least a full tone (unless you're down a half step anyway, then a semi tone) to play it in standard tuning.

at that age, i couldn't be bothered to fuck with tunings. i had one of those ibanezes with the locking bridges and the thumb screws, which means i would have had to unlock the thing to take it in and out of dropped-d or open c or whatever else. that's why i retabbed all the weird tunings for standard tuning. i mentioned it's good for the hands, but it was also good for getting to know the fretboard.

Mathews Barbosa
true story

Djalma Reis
You....damn, you could stay in silence, but no!, you wrote this. You've shared this with us; gold we find through the night on the internet. Thank you very much.

Grease Munkee
why wouldnt you just tune to the song?

deathtokoalas
well, it was the ibanez. i didn't know what it was when i bought it (well, my dad bought it), i was like 12 at the time. i don't know if they still make these things or not, but they lock the tuning in place near the nut and then give you thumb screws near the bridge to tune with. the thumb screws only let you go up or down about a tone or so, then you need to unlock the system at the nut. it's an annoying process. and, if you want to play four or five songs in a row in an alternate tuning, you're going to be spending more time fiddling around with the guitar's hardware than actually playing.

the purpose of the system is to prevent tremolo/whammy players from going out of tune. it's the kind of thing people like steve vai, who use a lot of whammy bar, need to get through a set on stage; not the best guitar for kids playing with tunings.

when i was about 15, my aunt gave me a $20 gift certificate at a local music store. it's the thought that counts, but the truth is she really had no idea that $20 doesn't go very far in a guitar store, and i didn't really need any more strings.

so, i took a look through the tab books. it was the mid 90s. i didn't need anybody to teach me how to play nirvana songs, that was easy enough. i'd already taught myself most of siamese dream (with a little help), and the best parts of superunknown, but would have probably jumped on either if they were there. they weren't. so, i grabbed the tab book for the first candlebox disc...

this one was a lot of fun to work through.

it's funny sometimes how you're playing a harmony over a chord change and it sounds familiar and you can't figure it out and then you do. :).

"you're sharper these days, roll on security."

have to blame hendrix for this in the end, though. plausibly through srv as an intermediate.

but, here's the thing: 6s, 7s, 9s, whatever - even 3s - rock music just needs to get beyond the 5s. don't tell me you can't punk up a major 7th. i've got a list for you. i do. that's what really made 90s rock sound so much more interesting - the simple fact that, harmonically, it really actually was more interesting.

also, why did they have to cut the track? it's jarring.

uploading me, myself & the time i thought this was a good idea (acoustic demo) to soundcloud

so, here's today's track.

=============

this was never meant to be released as it is, although i had some ideas about putting together an acoustic ep of tour material. neither touring nor the accompanying ep followed. but this is hanging out on the old hard drive, and it has some fucking charm to it, if i might say so myself. so, it gets to be the first up to my little lo-fi side site.

at the time (early 2002), i was working on some psychedelic pop demos with a friend of mine. i was loading the tracks up with all kinds of overdubs and effects and other fun things, but the possibility of performing the material live with just the two of us (without stooping to the level of backing tapes or, worse, those fucking horrid loop pedals that make everything sound like steve reich after a fucking lobotomy), was pretty much completely impossible. these songs were solid - they could hold their own on an acoustic. i also realized that acoustic music was on it's way up, so doing a little tour as a two-person harmonized folk duo was the way to go. this track, however, was written in a bit of a post-punk style and needed to be rearranged for acoustic guitar in order to have that idea work itself out.

so, i just demoed this up for the other guy (the vocals are just there to drive the track along; the other guy wrote them, not me) to get the point across. he didn't like any of this - not the touring as an acoustic folk duo idea, not the rearrangement on the track, nothing. in 2002. oops? it's the story of my musical career....

the track is full of messy playing, because i'm trying to sing at the same time and the vocals are rhythmically contrasted against the guitars - but mostly because nobody was supposed to hear this. i'll be re-recording this over the next few months, as i clean up my writing from the period.

https://soundcloud.com/deathtokoalas/me-myself-and-the-time-i-tried-to-convince-the-other-guy-it-was-a-good-idea

wow, soundcloud. unique usernames? what is it, 1997?

and, it's beyond surreal that they're forcing artists to pay to turn off comments. i remember back when that was soundcloud's gimmick. comments! at the precise point you're thinking them! because the world gives a fuck!

it's even the reason i've avoided it all these years.

so, fuck these guys.

but trendy people are trendy. it's the right place for these "lo-fi" demos.

https://soundcloud.com/deathtokoalas/

actually, maybe its one of those things i should do daily ups for. yeah.

it's all raw instrumental guitar stuff, probably the closest i'll ever get to being any kind of folk musician. i'll get these to a space on bandcamp eventually, once i decide what a reasonable thing to do with them is. like, do i want to release them as singles or together somehow? for now, i think using soundcloud as that kind of sketchpad is an interesting sort of experiment...

actually, i was just floored by the sheer volume. this is going to take a good night. i want to finish this track first. in a few days...

been playing with guitar effects...

....but also writing new tunes.

i'm trying to really focus on finishing old stuff rather than make new stuff, but then i start jamming something out and fuck me. the thing is who knows how long it will take to get around to seriously working on anything, when i have such a ridiculous list of stuff. so, i'm going to set up a soundcloud page for just random thoughts as they come out....

...and i'm actually going to put a bunch of stuff up there, 'cause i have a bunch of stuff in that current status.

23 likes.

1337 h4x0r.

nobody will get that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/23_enigma

weird what one finds on a random search. i'm working out a solo in f minor. searching for fun...

if you're going to do something like this, it would do a lot of good to explain why the chord is f minor. once you know that F, Ab, C (with f on the bottom) makes an Fm, it's just a process of finding the triad where you want it to be. i find the d shape to be quite nice for minor chords.

anyways, back to my solo in f minor :P

mumble mumble mumble

THE MUMBLE HAS MY SOUL....

deathtokoalas
so tired.

enough of this. been going on too long, now. need a manic episode, please. five, six days without sleeping. that's the good stuff....

@michael huggins in addition to the synth, you're dealing with an expression foot pedal connected to a pitch shifter, although i feel that your initial idea of a sampler is probably pretty accurate. i don't think the solo is live, i think it's cut up and pasted back together.

but you probably don't need an actual synth to get this, you just need some kind of software system with a foot pedal and a whammy bar. i could get something close to it out of a digitech whammy/pitch combo.

also, fwiw, the whammy work screams belew rather than fripp.

uploading i did your mom to youtube

so, with the shift to using youtube in a staggered historical presentation, my entire calculus on the value of uploading this or that track has changed. i was initially wanting to use it to highlight specific tracks to send people to bandcamp with, but the reality is that the only traffic i'm getting to bandcamp is through youtube and the site hosts so much music that it's basically impossible to sort through. it makes more sense to put almost everything up at youtube, and hope somebody stumbles on the right link.

this is a demented track that half of me wants to forget and the other half realizes has value in being just off the wall creepy. i need to trigger warning for anybody that's dealt with any kind of abuse, and out of just general bad taste. but, there's this point where you just half to laugh, and i think i pulled it off.

there's a more detailed write-up if you click the link.

however, the primary reason i'm uploading it here is that i like the music. it's really noisy and cathartic. if i'm documenting myself, i can't skip over it.

this will pass over to the featured track tomorrow at midnight.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oSadVCVav8

just to record this somewhere public...

the idea i've decided on is to literally stagger it by 17 years and eight months, with the bandcamp dates as reference. i'll explain by example.

the first song up is fire, which i'm guesstimating was completed on sept 1, 1996. the second is boogeyman, which i have down for oct 20, 1996. that's 51 days. fire will consequently stay at the front of the page for 51 days.

which means i should catch up to today in 17 years and eight months. :).

it also means that some tracks will be up front for very lengthy periods.

that table ($10) is a long time coming, but makes all the difference in the world in getting those synths off the floor and connected together.

i'd like to get another small table to give me a bit more foot space over on the other side where the small amp is. the idea would be to put the cases on top of the table, and some pedals underneath. the amplifier underneath the laptop is also being hoarded as a possible guitar amp system, but that depends on a lot of factors (the most important of which is if i ever end up playing anywhere). if that works itself out, that extra small table will also be useful. but if it doesn't, i can always take the cases out, too. that's going to depend on availability, mostly - and how much i feel i need the foot room.

for now, the studio is otherwise done to my need and liking. so, there's a few more shots...

(there's that table, set up with the gear on it, which 

     completes the loooooong process of finally reassembling 

a place where i can record safely and comfortably.

      i'm not letting go of it this time, either. no fucking way...)

that music stand came out totally blurred.

i spend most of my time sending guitar parts in,
either clean through the pod via usb or live into the mixer.

and that just completes the pseudo-panorama.
 that's where i'd want a tall, skinny coffee table type deal, maybe.
i've never bothered with boards, 'cause i'm constantly changing
things around, but the extra foot space is valuable.

scored a table for my synths for $10. a little beat up, but it works. i mean, a table needs to be sturdy, not pretty. sounds unexciting, but i've been looking for something the right size for months. that means i can finally get my synths and other machines off the floor and hooked up and get my pedals organized underneath...

in hindsight, i realize i was in a state of shock through the whole period of time i evicted myself back in late '11. i left well over $1000 worth of furniture in the apartment. i didn't even try and sell it! it didn't even cross my mind, i was so fucked up about it. so, i ended up in windsor without any tables or bookshelves....

guess i took a few days off. was super sore from walking, and more interested in reading. that's happened a few times recently, and i'm really not used to it. guess i'm out of shape from spending so much time inside and curled up this winter. and not smoking. seems weird, but if you're a smoker you get it. i'll snap out of it when i get my border papers and can start to get out to see some shows in detroit.

hopefully, the first one i'll be able to catch will be swans in late june. the time frames are sketchy. but hopefully. that's an excellent start, actually. and i'm gonna be pissed if i miss it. btw, there's a new swans record out today. so, you should stop reading my facebook page and go listen to it.

i've got acoustic strings, but they seem weird and i might replace them. haven't strung it up yet.

i otherwise think this track is going to complete itself pretty quickly.

the next one up is a short renaissance guitar piece that i've wavered about assigning to piano. there's going to be a few choice renders as well as at least one built up version of the track.

it's funny how quickly the machine will jolt you awake, though.

i seem to have forgotten to post this as influential on the track of the day, which is now track of the month in order to ease the tracks in a bit more slowly and get the counts up. i posted 70 tracks all at once. that was an error. so, now i guess there's going to be some retreading.

i'm picking this out specifically because the song of the day is full of flanging. and i know now that that's a cabaret voltaire thing. as far as the exact track is concerned, throbbing gristle is actually a better comparison musically - and einsturzende neubauten is a better comparison, thematically. but i didn't know that when i wrote it. what i knew at the time was this disc, which was pumping in the headphones every day for a year.

and i mean every day. for a year. at least. in hindsight, i have to say this record probably warped and damaged me pretty badly. or, to be more objective, that it really strongly shaped me.

(relative tracks: fire, most of the late 90s emo/noise/grunge/industrial demos that are at bandcamp but not youtube, bach goes loopy, happiness is a harsh gun, weed in the yard, all unauthorized remixes, the inridiculous compilation, the curious george suite, j's adventure in guitarland, schizoid, like divine amoebas, leonardo pisano, all symphonies and others that are not yet uploaded)

just had a good laugh at myself for realizing that i'm back to carrying around the ol' blankie...

well, i know enough now not to take it out of the house. but i actually think i always knew enough not to take it out of the house. at least i have no memories of taking it out of the house.

but, whatever i'm doing in here - reading, typing, watching, playing, recording - is all wrapped up in this blanket. and you're likely to get hit with a frying pan if you think you're taking it away from me.

*disheveled glare*

don't touch ma blankie. fuggin gumamint, stealing blankies. they came right in on some kid in florida, assault rifles, pried the blankie out at gunpoint.

i guess old habits die hard

great day to go for a walk. it went up from 10 to 20 as i was walking. and the high today is a nice 28. yay . best of all, it seems like the basement is retaining heat well. finally...

got stuck outside the music store (i needed strings) for a half hour before they opened, so i went across the street to the salvation army. i know. but, why not sort through the books while i'm waiting? i was looking specifically for an old text by thomas hobbes, which i think is actually on the banned books list. yes, there's still a banned books list. seriously.

danielle steel. wall to wall. i kid not. i burst out laughing, actually. says a lot about christian repression, doesn't it?

there's a used store down the street with literally everything. snagged my leviathan on the way back for $5.

also, i found a market that sells local tomatoes for a quarter of the cost of the imported mexican ones at the grocery store. happy about that.....

bad news: up to 12 more weeks before i hear back on my border papers. fuckers. i'm missing mt. zion this week and at this rate will probably also miss swans next month. fuck.

i have one more walking trip to make, and then i've got a nice comfy week of reading and recording.

thankfully, my old electro-acoustic seems playable, after all. i can't say for sure until i get some new strings on it, but the intonation problems are not what they were. i'm straining my memory, but i think i put a new nut in it a while back and that may be the difference. i'm also not sure why i seem to have strung a low e in place of a d or a high e in place of a g, but maybe i had some hunch that worked out. for some reason, my usually superb memory is particularly bad over about '06-'09. trauma, maybe. i was also a drone worker in that period (i exaggerate - tech support), maybe it's a function of that. but i just don't remember.

regardless, i need to get some proper strings on it to properly test the intonation. but the notes sound the same across the six strings as far as i could tell with my morning test. there's reason for optimism.

also, it was only warping past the 12th fret, which i can mostly play around. i do tend to get jangly near the top of the neck, but that sound can be faked with an electric. it's the percussive bottom end i'm more attached to. meaning worst case is still workable. i hope.

what happened was that i took it backpacking with me - and this was ten years ago almost to the day - and it came back with a culmination of damage related to extreme temperature and humidity shifts. one day, we're in the mountains where it's damp and rainy, the next day we're on the coast where it's bright and sunny. montreal to winnipeg in 24 hours was another really dramatic shift in humidity. and it was exposed to outside the whole time, pretty much. then it sat without being played for a long time (acoustics are loud. i was in close quarters. simple as that.). when i finally picked it back up, it seemed like it was just flat out warped. i had written it off, but couldn't part with it.

anyways, i'll get some strings in the morning. i think i've got the introduction part down, and managed to keep it to less than five parts. i might add another. i want to sit on that. so, i'm done for the night.

right now, i need to scour through some old books to see whether i actually have a copy of leviathan or not (i don't think so, but i've picked some "classics" up at garage sales for $0.50 and forgotten about them) before i go buy it. i'm ok with reading articles online, but i'm still tied to the flexibility of books for such things as reading on one's back....

Take your instinct by the reins
Your better bet's to rearrange
What we want and what we need
Has been confused, been confused

no, j. that section doesn't need 17 guitar overdubs.

....and first couple of guitars tracks are down.

see, this is what i was worried about.

it's 10 out, and 5:00 am, and i can feel the air coming down. which must be because the heat is on high two floors up, to fight the air on the main level.

i can't deal with that. i have to get the heat up. there's essentially no tenant that could deal with that. and it's going to squeeze him out, but it's his own fault.

ok. plugged in and jamming. finally. it's been 2.5 years. which is the longest i've ever gone. even with the minimal output between '07 and '11, it was mostly because i was scheming up other things, building the recording space, working, studying, writing, etc - but even with that, it was never more than a week, maybe two, between sessions, i was just working at a super slow pace and throwing a lot of things away (leaving me with about an hour of absurdly saturated completed music, roughly an hour of half completed music, several hours of demos and several more hours of discarded material - which is actually roughly comparable to the years before, just through a greater level of focus and detail and perfectionism. i suppose i could have had two or three records made up of the stuff that got ignored. people were asking me. 'j, do you have some new material yet?", and it was always "it's going to be the greatest record ever, or the most ridiculous record ever". when it does get tied together, it's going to be a lot of ideas ejected all at once....i'm not going to release it like that, but it's going to be a quadruple or quintuple disc in terms of material....).

and i'm remembering how much fun this is :)

so, i'm going to have to keep myself in check, here. i could see myself overdubbing guitars for the next six weeks if i don't give myself some boundaries.

stuck in the middle of an alley closing in on all sides (vst mix) (final)

those alternate tunings were more of a problem than i realized, as they cut out one of the guitar sections. i thought the guitar seemed quiet, but thought it was just a function of the technology.

the sampler i'm using to convert midi notes to guitar sounds will simply not allow shapes that can't be played on a guitar in standard tuning. it will allow you to lower the bottom string down to c, which opened up enough space in my case to get the chords out, but that won't allow for really impossible chord combinations. strangely, lowering the range fixed it because it also seems to try and automatically invert chords so they fit on the fretboard.....! i suppose that might be useful to a keyboard player that doesn't know guitars so well, but it's actually horrific for a guitarist that fully realizes what they're doing when they're typing up the notes.

so, i got the inversions to stop and all the notes to come out, so that will update via rss. well, hopefully that's the last version.

the one thing i can't get is this chord in the transition from the bass solo to the post-jazz section. i'm talking about this pesky A#. i could always create a new track and resequence it. yeah. i should do that, actually. good thing i didn't upload yet. but the chord is F-A#-C, from low to high. this is impossible to play on a guitar in standard tuning. the solution is to tune the D string down to a C, making an easy chord to fret. simple. but, the computer is instead just dropping the A# altogether...

that's good to know for future reference.

written late 2000 & early 2001. initially rendered mar 7, 2014. re-rendered due to shift in instrumentation on april 29, 2014. re-rendered again on may 3, 2014 to allow for audible acoustic guitars, after a rewrite to allow the computer to play in an alternate tuning.

it was vindication, if unfortunate, walking to the front entrance today and getting a rush of hot air from upstairs. you know when you come in from outside and can feel the heat rushing at you? it was like that. except i was walking from a basement to a main floor, and feeling the heat coming from behind a closed door and *down* a flight of stairs. and it's 13, not -20. and it's electric radiator heat, too. indicating that it was just right cranked. no doubt to fight the air conditioning on the main floor. i've mostly avoided raising it past 21, which has mostly kept it off. i'm not likely to crank it more than 22 more than a few hours at a time. so, somebody else is more irritated than i am by this unseasonable air conditioning...

i slept through most of the afternoon; a hot shower warmed me up nicely and then knocked me out cold. but it does seem as though it was on again a little after 4:00. i'm still feeling it a bit...

that's another possible answer, for the short term, that i can accommodate better than my neighbours. if he's going to turn the air up in the afternoon and leave it off overnight, i can sleep in the afternoon and stay awake overnight.

there's a bunch of reasons i don't really want to crank it. the rent is low here. i'd rather wear a sweater than see a rent increase, but it's within reason - what's a piss off is how unreasonable setting the air to below 20 is. which i think is the real reason i'm concerned, rather than the actual temperature. that, i can deal with. but if we get into this a/c v radiator fight, it's going to fuck the landlord and that's going to fuck us. electric heating is also quite dry. and the truth is that i like it a little cool. it's one of the reasons i like basements.

we might finally get a real warm up next week, but it looks sketchy.

i'd normally go talk to the guy, but it's not a situation where we're legal under the law. tenant law is badly skewed towards family members. if it's intended to intimidate non-family members, it's worked. i have to be careful to not get into conflict with them and more or less resign myself to his right to have the air as he wants it.

see, the flip side is i have the right to get the heat up. and the lease is the lease, regarding rent costs. there was a verbal agreement to keep the rent static. i think that endows me with a responsibility to try to minimize heating costs. the day i get a rent increase, that's out the window. but, for now i'd like to try and stick to it.

it's just...it all revolves around being reasonable. and the actual owner is reasonable. but i don't feel like i'm getting that from his brother upstairs.

i mean, it's hard to compute the idea that he doesn't realize turning the air on in an unseasonably cold early may and late april is unreasonable. this has to be "i don't fucking care". and it can't really be something that an explanation can resolve.

wonder how successful a claim that current tenant law is unconstitutional would be. it's clearly discriminatory; not clearly enumerated, but perhaps analogous. see, it pits s. 15 rights directly against "property rights", which are in quotes because there is actually no legal recognition of property rights in canada, despite the idea being thrown around by various types of liberals. i mean, there's contract law. sure. but it's not at all the same thing. i would *hope* that s. 15 would trump these imaginary "property rights". but that's up to the judge...

i'd be skeptical. but it would be an interesting case that would bring to light a lot of interesting questions. or, at least it would if i was orchestrating it.

gah....

note to self: indicate alternate tunings in future scores.

in all fairness to myself, i actually do specifically recall having it written out, but it was something i lost in the nwc destruction (which is why the track got thrown into a state of purgatory in the first place). and i know it's recorded in some of the other songs i was working out to notation in the same period.

thankfully, it's a simple tuning that was easy to figure out: take d down to c. but i was scratching my head for a minute.

ERROR.

THIS CHORD IS IMPOSSIBLE. PLEASE TRY ANOTHER CHORD.

turns out i had plenty of electric strings, after all. i'll have to get some acoustic strings, but i'm actually not even sure the guitar is usable. forgot about that.

i'm still debating whether to swap the strings on my jazz guitar. i'll probably do a few tests and then decide. bright, new strings are the fucking worst. but there's a point where they're a tetanus risk, too, and just sound dead. that middle point is the sweet spot. which generally means "don't ever change a string, unless it breaks".

...which is pretty rare on the jazz guitar, which is a black epiphone coronet. well, not really. this guitar was actually somebody's frankenstein, with what appears to be a vintage coronet neck pasted onto some kind of ibanez. i leave 12s on this guy and use it for about 80% of my recording, and have since the late 90s.

the other guitar is a red epiphone sg copy with much louder pickups (one may recall the high gain sg craze of a few years ago, although that wasn't a factor in getting it) that i keep 11s on and use sparingly for specific fuzzy lead sections. to me, 11 is low gauge; anything less than that, and i'm breaking strings every session...

i've variously had other guitars hanging around for alternate tunings and whatnot, but they've disappeared. i know i tossed one because i got shocked from it. there's another that seems to have been stolen, along with an electric mandolin and a 12-string guitar and some other things.

but that's all ready to go now for when i wake up. :).

it's sort of comical to me that these thick strings are being presented as anomalous to make your shredding sound thicker, when the purpose of skinny strings was to help shredders get through certain sections because they couldn't play it on "normal" jazz strings. which are actually 13s. i mean, i guess it's nice to see that the trick is no longer perceived as necessary, but this stuff is more flash than substance. this is really quite silly.

thick strings like this are great for blues players, and help to fatten up those big jazz chords, if you play them. punkabilly. etc. but if you want to seriously shred? well, they cut the gauge down specifically for you. and this shit is deceiving...

on second thought, those numbers are too static. i'll have to let it be more fluid. i'm having difficulty defining precise categories. that'll have to define itself as it goes through.

like, i'm averaging a little under 100 hits a day, so i could theoretically hit 1000 in under a month. but it's spiking up and down. the curve is upwards. so, those bigger numbers might be less ridiculous looking in a few months from now.

this is a surreal thing to read, perhaps. well, i'm talking to myself, here, i'm just letting you listen in, if you'd like. it's for the wikis of the future, really. you're just experiencing it in real time. feel special, or something.

see, the numbers aren't really the important part of it. i think that's my point, here. it's the ramp up tied to the chronology. and i suppose that's premised on the assumption of a continued ramp up, making it pointless to make strong predictions in the first place. 5000 hits in may is very different than 500.

so, i guess i could take it down around 1000. or maybe around 500. i'll have to see when it feels right to continue the emulation. it's the emulation i'm announcing, whatever the numbers end up being...

uploading fire to youtube

i keep cycling back to these super old tracks, but i hadn't really conceived of how to do this well until right now. see, here's the thing...

The Game of Youtube is to get things sent viral. now, this isn't a game i'm into for two reasons. the first is simply that i don't think i have a high chance of winning. there's nothing about any of this music that is likely to break through any mainstream barriers - thankfully. i'd have a lot less respect for myself if i thought these pieces could potentially go viral. the second is that having a viral video seems to be something like having a cocaine addiction: there's a painful crash involved that i'd rather not deal with. fifteen minutes of fame isn't worth ten years of derision.

what i'm interested in is getting the ideas out. i've had this discussion with so many people that just don't understand my thinking on this. no, i don't want to be famous - shockingly. some of us really don't want to be famous. really. some of us just want to be able to live a comfortable, mostly anonymous existence producing art. it's very sad just how confusing so many people find this. it really reflects how shallow the culture is.

but, the cycling algorithms i've been using have been too short to get any kind of a point across. i need to leave songs up for a week or two at a time, not a day or two. i'm consequently cycling back for a third and final time and partitioning the set of tracks into the following subsets, which i plan on mapping to the following number of views:

100 - meh
1000 - dead experiments & extended tracks
10000 - completed symphonies & epics

i'm purposefully doing something else wrong, here. i'm supposed to pick my best tracks and push them, right? that's pretty rational, really. why market something i feel is a "dead experiment" at all? because i'm the product. it's the story.

i feel that if i stick to this kind of approach, and increment chronologically, while continuing to post comments, i'll be able to slowly get the pieces out in a way that mimics the construction of myself as a character.

the first track up is fire, which is either a dead experiment or an extended track. i'm a little over 100. this catastrophe needs to get past 1000, which i'm thinking should take about a month.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2E0p0sWW4c

as for the oldNew track i'm working on, i spent yesterday doing grocery shopping and today tying up some other beginning of the month type loose ends. i forgot to get new strings, but that can wait until tomorrow. i will be laying down tracks overnight.

i've also set up a companion facebook page for the comments. it's a front for the google+ page, which goes all the way back (although, sadly, not as far as before i was forced to switch). but in a sense i'm starting again right now. and this should really all be interpreted as integrated.

https://www.facebook.com/deathtokoalas?filter=1

the hits are more about staggering the process, and trying to emulate the timing associated with a musician beginning from scratch and building it's way up.

think of it like a virtual reality.


==

this is literally the first thing i recorded, when i was 15, so i'm not particularly invested in defending it's quality. yet, it remains an intriguing listen. i was trying pretty hard to be weird. all these years later, i'm sort of impressed with myself in accomplishing that.

i suppose it's sort of fitting that my first musical statement reduces to some kind of anarchist rant about burning the world down, or more accurately about letting the world burn itself down. somebody said that destruction is never negative because it is required to rebuild. that's stuck with me for many years.

so, the crux of this is an orchestration of a world on fire, as i imagined it, when i was 15. which, oddly, sounds somewhat like kurt cobain jamming over a throbbing gristle workout. it's easy to see why i've pulled it out and salvaged it, despite it's many flaws.

yeah. heating situation here is now officially ridiculous, and something buddy and his brother are going to have to work out.

it hit a low of about 7 degrees this morning, with an overcast high of 12. even so, there was enough retained heat in here from yesterday that the heater didn't really kick in until this morning - and even so, only weakly. but, see, the air conditioner wasn't on. nor should it have been, with temperatures ranging between 7 and 12 - in addition to it being overcast and rainy. so, it was *actually* close to 21 in here. which was nice.

in addition to this, it seems like nobody was home up there for most of the day, which allowed this normal situation to go undetected. the air is now noticeably on, which is triggering the heaters again.

it's 12 degrees out. the heat came on because it's cold. that's what heaters are supposed to do. but the heaters were in fact barely even running. i'm being totally normal here; it's turning the air on to reverse normal heating operations when it's 12 degrees out that is anomalous.

and, i had the bathroom heater off, but am going to have to put it back on.

i mean, i can get that these are bigger people. so, it's like they're always wearing a few extra layers. ok. but, why not open the window, then, when it's overcast and twelve? that makes a big difference for the surrounding units, due to the way air conditioning works.

it's been a slow ramp down, but i'm willing to finally (albeit cautiously) declare myself a purely social smoker. the last three weeks of april were pretty much cold turkey, we're talking one or two opportunistic puffs over three weeks, and it's really put me over that final hump. i've been slowly disassociating the habit from the things i had it attached to: wake up, after meal, etc. at this point, those connections are just not there anymore. i even spent my smoke money on mushroom soup, which sounds weird but the expenses related to fixing my pc had me broke all month and i found myself down to spaghetti and canned beans the last week, which is something i don't want to repeat. hence, a large stack of mushroom soup (which i use as pasta sauce).

so, i have no nicotine budgeted for may. if i get to june 1st without breaking, i'll be done with the "cautiously" part.

it was weird walking around this morning, though, 'cause i found myself hypersensitive to other people smoking. smokers will mostly agree that they can't really smell the smoke coming from the guy at the bus stop. i can't say it ever bothered me before i started smoking, either. but, when you've stopped smoking for a while, you start to notice it, and it starts to bug you because you're trying to avoid it. it's especially been the smell, for me; once it gets in your clothes, you start carrying it around with you and it's a constant reminder. i mean, i'm sure i'll get used to it over time. but that was a surreal experience that i took as indicative of something positive...

the new cloud nothings record

i was a bit weirded out by the first single, which is at least thankfully left at the end so it can be, err, quarantined, but this is definitely near the top of the year-end list, if the year-end list isn't full of pretentious garbage. i tend not to agree with most critics this side of the pitchfork abomination, but the acclaim on this is warranted. i just have a few suggestions for those reacting badly...

a) try headphones. it's not a stereo thing so much as it's a volume thing.
b) turn it up as loud as you possibly can.

i guess if you don't like loud, fast, energetic punk music then that's another issue. and i suppose a lot of people that are actually closer to my age (maybe a bit younger) really don't like that kind of fast, energetic music. which is a part of the record's appeal to those that are going to get it for what it is.

but, you know what they say: fuckin' hippies.

best strategy is to keep it off most of the time, and set it high for about an hour when the air gets bad. i mean, i don't want to kill my landlord on the electrical bill, either.

i really think it should cease to be a concern once we get a week or two over 20 and i can just keep the window open. it's just that the basement is having a hard time "turning over" because we're stuck in this middle temperature range, and the air is really acting as a huge setback in it doing so...

actually, no. it's the gradient i'm noticing. keeping at 21.5 is just a waste of electricity - i'll have to crank it if the air comes on, regardless.

it seems to have levelled out. thankfully.

what i'm going to do is take it down to 21.5 and just leave it there. that'll trigger it before it gets too cold...

it must be about 10-15 degrees upstairs.

i mean, it's been over 20 all day and the heater has been working at 50% for an hour to get it to 22. ridiculous...

i've lived in air conditioned basements ~ half my life, and i've never seen an air unit run this irresponsibly.

another way to measure the temperature down here is via the floor. and i'll just say that the floor was not this cold at any point in the winter. which is bizarre.

i should hopefully be able to turn it back off in a few hours.

i mean, i can't articulate how stupid it is that i'm cranking the baseboard heat to fight off the air conditioner upstairs on this rarest of nice days of the year so far. but it would be below 20 in here, otherwise. and that's not acceptable to me.

i just wish it would warm up and stay warmed up. if we can get a week or two of warm weather, the basement will heat up. it's just that all we're getting right now is a few hours every week or so, which the air is negating. so, it feels like march in here because every time we get that little bit of warmth (a) it goes away and (b) the air sucks it out.

and the landlord wants to put an air conditioner in here. i'm trying to explain to him that it's not only unnecessary, it's completely backwards. he needs to try to get his brother to turn the air down....

i mean, if my thermostat can't even get to 22 then it's certainly not air conditioner weather. that's called enjoying the warm weather. air conditioner weather is 30+.

the thermostat was hovering around 21 naturally (ie not really on) before i turned it up to 22, but that was not indicative of what it feels like in here. it's that frigid air conditioning air that sinks down and makes you feel like it's january, even as the temperature in the room stays steady. yuck.

yeah. it's 25 degrees out and i'm shivering with a sweater on. absurd.

so, the heat is now on. buddy can explain that to his brother.

i mean, move to winnipeg if you want to live in a tundra.

these teases of summer are painful.

...and it's finally warm out for a few hours and the air upstairs has triggered the heat on. again.

whatever. the window is open. and if i have to, i'll turn the heat up. i don't care at this point. it's just inconsiderate to turn the air up that high, this early.

stuck in the middle of an alley closing in on all sides (vst mix) (intermediate)

i posted this back at the beginning of march, right before my drive crashed, with the caveat that i may revisit it slightly. the drums need some work, but i'm not going to use (directly programmed) midi to tweak them, so that leaves this done with. this is final (as chiptune). no further tweaks.

the update, however, is the addition of a wind section to take over some arpeggiation. i've boosted this slightly in the mix, but not too much. it was finding that middle point that took all day.

i've probably pointed out a few times that you need to listen to this stuff loud and through headphones to get it. this is especially true of this track, which needs volume and headphones to get the dynamics right.

canned guitars aside, or perhaps included, i think this mix sounds outstanding. it's just going to get better, though, as i layer it over with drum effects and live guitars.

this is the vst mix, including computer generated guitars. in addition to being the core of the final track, it's interesting to point out just how good computer music can sound nowadays. excluding the introduction, i didn't play a single note in this song. the guitars are all played through midi-based vst instruments and put into digital amp models and digital effects emulators. it's really rather remarkable how far the technology has come....

written in early 2001. initially rendered mar 7, 2014. re-rendered due to shift in instrumentation on apr 29, 2014.
 
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/track/vst-mix

rap news 24

deathtokoalas
it's actually not apartheid, which most people don't understand the meaning of. the west has chosen to use the term apartheid due to positive association with the so-called victory in south africa (which has not really ended racial separation there at all, it's just created a small black upper class) and due to concerns about the possible offensiveness of accusing an israeli state of genocide. but, if it were apartheid then the goal would be to convert gaza and the west bank into factories to produce goods for israelis, which sadly was actually proposed by the americans recently as part of a "peace plan" to "improve the palestinian economy" but was rejected outright by the israelis, who want to ethnically cleanse the area. the proper terminology for this is not apartheid but genocide.

...and this marketing strategy to make bds and other actions seem less "anti-semitic" has unfortunately failed. i think it's time to backtrack and be more graphic about the truth of the matter.

stop calling it apartheid. start calling it the genocide that it is.

archi2a
So every company that has factories abroad is evil? Or does that only apply to the ones owned by jews?

deathtokoalas
that depends on whether you've stopped beating your wife or not. have you, archi2a?

it's capitalism itself that is "evil" due to the reduction of human labour to a commodity. whether the model is being applied to asian workers being beaten to make electronics for westerners or palestinians forced into wage slavery for israeli luxuries, we're talking about the same fundamentally horrific situation.

however, that's not what is happening. the israelis do not want the palestinians as slaves. they simply want them removed from the planet. this is not apartheid; it's genocide.

fwiw, i don't have enough faith in markets to think that bds has the potential to be successful. nor does the israeli government seem to take it seriously. netanyahu is just using it as a prop to raise campaign funds. but that's not particularly relevant to pointing out the nature of the situation on the ground, how the apartheid designation is drawing attention away from the genocide that is continuing and drastic steps that ought to be taken to counter it.

archi2a
If the Israelis want the Palestinians "removed from the planet", why does Israel supply electricity, and medical aid to the Gaza strip? Why does it allow palestinians to be treated in israeli hospitals?  If there's a "genocide", where are the piles of corpses of Palestinian civilians(that's what happens in a real genocide). Why does the Palestinian population have one of the highest ratio of growth if they're being mass murdered?

deathtokoalas
your questions are talking points - propagandistic in nature - and not worth answering directly. further, you probably work for somebody that is paying you to post this and i probably don't have a legitimate chance of convincing you, because you're not actually thinking about the things that you're posting. however, for the benefit of other people reading this, i'll talk around your talking points.

israel can't simply snap a finger and be done with the palestinians in a moment. if it was that simple, they indeed would have done so. there are some boundaries that they have to adhere to so as to maintain a working relationship with their allies, which include arab governments in the region who are concerned about how continued israeli colonization of the region may destabilize their own governments. so, it has to carry out a long and slow process of colonization and replacement. the current stage of this long term process is related to eliminating the possibility of a future palestinian state. that is a type of genocide. if you look up what the word means, you'll see that. but, you're not interested in doing this, you're just pushing nationalist propaganda.

archi2a
I stated facts, go ahead and check them for yourself, or come visit Israel or Gaza and see for yourself, I've got nothing to hide. 2) I can actually get paid for exposing biased BS about Israel? Who should I sign with?

deathtokoalas
i doubt i'd be allowed into the highly contained open-air prison that is gaza. from the israeli perspective, this is an effective way to contain the palestinian population in the short run. it's admittedly not entirely clear what the long term plan regarding gaza is, but the foreseeable future is for israel to continue to run it as a prison.

archi2a
Gaza is not controlled by Israel. There are no israeli soldiers there. And anyone can come and go through the security checkpoints. Furthermore, Gaza also has border with Egypt, which is too in a war against Hamas and also strictly controlls its border to prevent weapon smuggling.

deathtokoalas
see, this is so outlandishly absurd that it's more worthy of laughter than any kind of response.

as rap news once said, many years ago,

"people, please, research the truth. nowadays, it isn't hard to do."

archi2a
What is absurd? The fact that Gaza has a border with Egypt? Check a map for G-d's sake. That's exactly what I'm telling you, research the truth. I've only stated facts, which you can verify yourself. Or, as I said, come visit, see for yourself and draw your own conclusions.

deathtokoalas
mmmhmmm. like the fact that gaza is no longer under israeli occupation?

archi2a
Exactly. Do you have any picture of Israeli soldiers stationed in Gaza after the disengagement in 2005?

deathtokoalas
these lines in the sand are based around these arbitrary technicalities, like kids playing dungeons and dragons. as though moving a few feet past some arbitrary border has any meaning to anybody except professional propagandists. and this is something israel has utilized quite loudly: move the soldiers back ten feet, then claim you've withdrawn. the united nations isn't buying it. independent media observers aren't buying it. really, nobody is buying it at all.

you're lucky i've got a headache and am hungry, because i want to be recording guitar tracks right now, but am waiting until midnight for a check to clear to get something delicious to put on my spaghetti...

i've got some pictures of some people being prevented from delivering food & medical supplies. that almost seems like a blockade of some sort. and when you can blockade somebody from all angles that's the same as occupying them.

but, wait, let me guess - that was unnecessary because israel runs a generous welfare stare that provides them with everything they could possibly need. that was a previously stated fact. so, they must have been smuggling in weapons. qed. those terrorists!

archi2a
Yes, of course there's a blockade by sea, to prevent Hamas smuggling weapons from it's main backer: Iran. Anyone who wishes to donate to Gaza can do so through the Red Cross, Israel, or Egypt, but not by sea. And like I said, Egypt controlls its own border with Gaza in the same way.

You can answer when you think more clearly, if you wish.

deathtokoalas
i see. so, gaza is not occupied by israel, israel just controls all movement in and out of the area through direct military force, by means of it's own interests in the region. got it. the difference is absolutely meaningful and abundantly clear.

archi2a
Yes, both Israel and Egypt. And if Hamas didn't rocket israeli population, this blockade wouldn't be necessary. In fact, if there hadn't been for the constant suicide bombing in bars and buses, there would be no security fence either (at least not in the Israeli border).

deathtokoalas
mmmhmmm. so, you would embrace the right of return, then, if the palestinians would only denounce violent tactics?

archi2a
I would embrace a Palestinian state coexisting in peace with the State of Israel.

deathtokoalas
indeed. it's easy to state that once you've built security fences around the area. separate and unequal. but, does that mean you would support an immediate moratorium on settlements in the west bank, to ensure that this theoretical state can exist somewhere in the physical world? do you realize that existing government policy is to eliminate the possibility for such a state in the west bank by cutting into the area piece by piece?

also, supposing that the state of israel continues to refuse to accept the palestinian right of return, how do you propose that palestinian families regain the land that was stolen from them besides using force?

deathtokoalas
obligatory "influential on song of the next few days" track.

rap and hip-hop have never been my thing; i've always preferred the energy and musicality of punk to the more club-oriented hip-hop/rap approach. but, i'm not one to arrive at a conclusion without trying it out first.

ain't nobody ever called me a nigga, but loser has been a consistently applied accusation and/or adjective. i kind of identified with that, without being able to identify with that. know what i'm saying? so, that's a shout out to nwa....

(relevant tracks: unintelligible)

marshaul

Musicality of punk? Best joke of the week!

deathtokoalas

punk is supposed to be catchy...

hip-hop tends to lack things like chord progressions, polyrhythms, syncopation, harmonies and melodies. that is not true of punk.

Jay Townsend

If you want harmony then listen to bone thugs

deathtokoalas

i'll grant you this overlooked point - there's a non-trivial intersection of hip-hop with gospel that has very rich harmonic content. it's contextual to the culture, though. not the easiest thing for an atheist middle class white kid from canada to understand.

the harsher side of it actually makes more sense than the gospel side of it, in the context of it being a type of electronic music and electronic music being the musical zeitgeist over most of my life. i listen to all kinds of stuff that's heavily influenced by hip-hop (autechre, say - or nine inch nails). i've just found that getting into anything with the word "hip-hop" explicitly attached to it is almost impossible.

obligatory "influential on song of the next few days" track.

there's not much i listened to as a kid that i'd claim i "grew out of". conversely, i think i grew up so fast that it's acted as a handicap on my social skills. it's hard to relate to your peers when you....can't relate to your peers. that makes it very hard to live, generally, whether the topic is getting along with people at work or trying to network academically. as a teen, i wasn't able to relate to much of what was marketed to me because it all seemed so vacuous and childish. so, i mostly spent the mid 90s exploring music from the 80s that people ten or fifteen years older than me were into. the little bit of contemporary rock music i did like is largely looked at as classic rock at this point, leaving me with little to really be actively embarrassed about. but, korn is the one glaring exception of something i cannot understand why i liked, but did like, and did connect to, despite being mostly appalled by it now.

nor can i think of much of anything else that i dropped so quickly or comprehensively. billy corgan hasn't done anything i actually like since roughly 2000, but i still check out his new releases. in contrast, i haven't heard a new korn record since "follow the leader". like, honestly. a song here or two, sure, but haven't bothered to sit down and listen to a full record. it was almost like i had some kind of  epiphany: this actually sucks. there's literally no trace of korn in anything i recorded after about 1997.

there is, however, a noticeable guitar influence in my earliest demos. it doesn't come entirely from korn. nirvana did the same kind of riffing, as did white zombie. i'd learn later that it ultimately comes from swans, mostly via melvins and/or black flag. at the time, though, in my fifteenth and sixteenth year, it was those three sources that defined the chugging style: korn, nirvana and white zombie.

there's a secondary influence in the flanging, but that itself is more reasonably pulled out of something like nin, specifically the fixed ep.

(relevant tracks: fire, several tracks on the first two punk/emo/industrial/noise demos that are available at bandcamp but are not uploaded to youtube)

stuck in the middle of an alley closing in on all sides (orchestral fade out)

mixes 2-5 have been replaced. mix 6 has been retained to represent the "original track", as it is the closest of the mixes to what i was hearing as i was scoring it. but to keep with my posting format, i need to record today as the day that a new mix, mix 7, was rendered.

mix one, that is the fully modern vst mix, should be up very shortly. i'm toying with upping mixes that contain no guitars and/or mixes that contain only guitars. conversely, i may just upload the cpr file as a part of the download so people can play with it. customizable sound founts may even be the future of music, or some other meaningless vague projection that probably isn't true because people couldn't seriously be bothered.

this is just played through the orchestral preset of bandstand, with the caveat that the drivers are very poor (forcing the machine to miss things faster than an 1/8th note). the bass part was definitely written for electric bass, but it sounds neat through an orchestral haze, doesn't it?

written in early 2001. rendered and modified on apr 27, 2014.

stuck in the middle of an alley closing in on all sides (directmusic mix)

played through winamp on a sb live! through directmusic and captured in a sound editor.

written in early 2001. initially rendered feb 11, 2014. re-rendered due to shift in instrumentation on apr 27, 2014.

stuck in the middle of an alley closing in on all sides (bandstand mix)

i downloaded bandstand for the drums because the way i wrote the track required something that would read general midi through channel 10 and this isn't really how cubase normally works. bandstand is basically a way to play old midi files through vst by emulating a wavetable card in software, so this qualifies as a different card mix.

written in early 2001. initially rendered feb 11, 2014. re-rendered due to shift in instrumentation on apr 27, 2014.

stuck in the middle of an alley closing in on all sides (m-audio mix)

played through winamp on an m-audio delta and captured in a sound editor.

written in early 2001. initially rendered feb 11, 2014. re-rendered due to shift in instrumentation on apr 27, 2014.