well, i got the ram updated in my old pc from 640mb to 1gb, which cost me $12. 1 gb is the max the board can take (this thing is ooooold). i haven't re-installed my sleek image yet, but it's definitely faster just browsing through the desktop. i have a usb 2.0 card (yes, the ports are 1.1, it's that old) coming for $10. i'll eventually have to replace the hard drive (mechanical parts, *will* eventually die), but this old clunker is otherwise absolutely maxed out.
the guy that sold it to me jerked out, though. he said he'd sell the 256 sticks for $4 each or give me 5 for $12. well, it's no brainer. i was expecting at least one of them wouldn't work, and sure enough one of them doesn't. but, within the 5 sticks are 2 64s. so, i got 2 working 256s, a broken 256 and two working 64s. well, i would have paid $6 a stick (that's still stupidly cheap), but if you're going to sell them at $4 a piece (and having one that doesn't work is a reasonable chance one takes when buying 15 year old ram from kijiji), why bother basically giving me two 64s for free? why not just tell me you only had 3 in the first place?
i'm going to hope he made an honest error on that, cause it doesn't otherwise make sense to me.
...not like i have any use for two sticks of 64-mb sdram.
Saturday, April 5, 2014
people
have heard swans and lpd, but the truth is that my analog string sounds
in the late 90s were mostly trying to emulate the mellotron found on
this record, which would subsequently be purchased by tony banks and
used prominently in genesis. in any case, this is the root of all of it.
so, the other suggestions are not wrong, they're just finding a common
influence.
(relevant tracks: constant, throughout)
(relevant tracks: constant, throughout)
this
more or less replaced fixed as my go-to nin record for busing and had a
big influence on me in terms of rhythms slowly developing over time.
it's something that mostly comes out in the remixes, this sort of
evolving, mutating thing...it's very much process music....
(relevant tracks: on sexual awkwardness in adolescence, symphonies 4 & 5, teenage jesus (suicide), others)
(relevant tracks: on sexual awkwardness in adolescence, symphonies 4 & 5, teenage jesus (suicide), others)
this
record had such a weird influence on me, mostly because the sequencers
are consistently using vanilla general midi settings, which is all i had
available to me at the time through my pc sequencer. so i found myself
relating really heavily to these primitive string sections...
(relevant tracks: schizoid, wish, on sexual awkwardness in adolescence)
(relevant tracks: schizoid, wish, on sexual awkwardness in adolescence)
deathtokoalas
this was their comeback disc, after their disastrous attempt at trying to be real life big ass rock stars. it's interesting to note how many people are pointing out they were young when it was released. i was 14 as well. first sonic youth disc. and, yes, it had a huge effect on me..
(relevant tracks: screwed up, all the symphonies, [2002], more)
Paul S
they've never screwed up, not artistically. Don't think they ever been considered 'big-ass rock stars' ----where did you get that from ? theyr'e like the artiest rock band ever,
deathtokoalas
they toned things down dramatically at the precise time they signed to geffen. the band had a bit of a split personality for pretty much it's entire existence, but they were very obviously in world domination mode between daydream nation and washing machine, and i don't think it's a coincidence that that's their weakest period (non-inclusive), musically.
Paul S
I like all their albums but fair enuff.
rickiwarrior
Hi. I could not help reply.... I understand how this album is a comeback, but I do not consider it´s predecessors disastrous attempts at all. I think that Sonic Youth´s relevance is based in that period you call "weakest" as well, because then, they proved that their talent can be comprehended massively (or commercially), not only by hardcore fans.---------------------------------------------------- I was born in 1982, so in 1995 I was just 13 years old. I started with Sonic Youth recently, around 2000, after I borrowed Dirty from a friend, and since then, is one of my Sonic Youth favorite albums. Washing Machine is really difficult to dig, so it takes 5 times more to love, and at this moment, for me it´s equally loveable as Dirty, I don´t know how would I feel about this in the future - (by the way, I can get enough of WM and The Diamond Sea.....ufff)---------- Finally, where does the Geffen period ends and begins?
deathtokoalas
what you mean to say is that they watered the sound down to sell more records.
sonic youth's cultural relevance is not their geffen years. it's their sst years. sister and daydream nation, particularly (although daydream nation wasn't on sst). the stuff after washing machine was very good for a while, but it will have no cultural impact. likewise, as bad a record as it was, people in their 40s today may look back at dirty as something they liked in a period of their life, but it will not be passed on to the next generation.
daydream nation, on the other hand, will be referenced for the next century.
this was their comeback disc, after their disastrous attempt at trying to be real life big ass rock stars. it's interesting to note how many people are pointing out they were young when it was released. i was 14 as well. first sonic youth disc. and, yes, it had a huge effect on me..
(relevant tracks: screwed up, all the symphonies, [2002], more)
Paul S
they've never screwed up, not artistically. Don't think they ever been considered 'big-ass rock stars' ----where did you get that from ? theyr'e like the artiest rock band ever,
deathtokoalas
they toned things down dramatically at the precise time they signed to geffen. the band had a bit of a split personality for pretty much it's entire existence, but they were very obviously in world domination mode between daydream nation and washing machine, and i don't think it's a coincidence that that's their weakest period (non-inclusive), musically.
Paul S
I like all their albums but fair enuff.
rickiwarrior
Hi. I could not help reply.... I understand how this album is a comeback, but I do not consider it´s predecessors disastrous attempts at all. I think that Sonic Youth´s relevance is based in that period you call "weakest" as well, because then, they proved that their talent can be comprehended massively (or commercially), not only by hardcore fans.---------------------------------------------------- I was born in 1982, so in 1995 I was just 13 years old. I started with Sonic Youth recently, around 2000, after I borrowed Dirty from a friend, and since then, is one of my Sonic Youth favorite albums. Washing Machine is really difficult to dig, so it takes 5 times more to love, and at this moment, for me it´s equally loveable as Dirty, I don´t know how would I feel about this in the future - (by the way, I can get enough of WM and The Diamond Sea.....ufff)---------- Finally, where does the Geffen period ends and begins?
deathtokoalas
what you mean to say is that they watered the sound down to sell more records.
sonic youth's cultural relevance is not their geffen years. it's their sst years. sister and daydream nation, particularly (although daydream nation wasn't on sst). the stuff after washing machine was very good for a while, but it will have no cultural impact. likewise, as bad a record as it was, people in their 40s today may look back at dirty as something they liked in a period of their life, but it will not be passed on to the next generation.
daydream nation, on the other hand, will be referenced for the next century.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)