grargh...
i need to clarify a point, because i'm working against something that is so engrained that it's considered almost crazy to even question it.
if you're a younger person listening to this, i don't want to alienate you or anything. i had diverse tastes when i was younger. there were plenty of artists i enjoyed that had a mean listening base at least a decade older than i was at the time, and it didn't really bother me. what bothered me was that so few people my age had any interest in it, or seemed to stigmatize it as "old". i never really understood that, and it just struck me as immature. so, if you can see through that kind of bullshit then good for you - and i can legitimately relate, too.
but i need to be clear that i'm not a young person, and i don't write music for young people. i'd imagine the proper listening demographic ought to be gender and race neutral, but decidedly middle-aged. it's targeted towards people in their 40s and 50s.
it's partly a reflection of the culture, but it's more of a reflection of me. now, it took me years and years to become cognizant of this; i don't want to present it as something that's been obvious from the start, because it isn't. but the reality is that it wouldn't have ever made any sense for me to write for young people, because i've never understood young people. i suppose artists are often isolated people, but i take the stereotype to a different extreme. how can i write for people i can't converse with? that makes no sense. i've never asked anybody on a date before in my life. i've usually had either zero or one close friend in my life at a time - and usually zero. so, how can i write about experiences i've never had, to a generation i've never interacted with? but, i've grown up listening to music written by people that are today in their 50s and 60s. so, i've had some communication [even if it's one-way] with the older generation. i've had essentially no communication with the younger generation.
it happens to be that the younger generation(s) have not defined themselves as artistically inclined. i think this has to do with the economic circumstances that have asserted themselves since 1980, and became devastatingly retarding in the 1990s. but, that's not the point. i'm not clinging to an older demographic out of a perceived decrease in quality - although i do perceive that decrease in quality. i'm clinging to the older demographic out of an inability to relate to people my own age, and to people younger.
so, i run into these suggestions of a more sexualized presentation to appeal to a younger demographic, and it's just, like "this is not the reality i live in". i don't want to present a judgement. it's just not how i perceive the art being disseminated. i want tips on how to appeal to an older demographic that has moved on past their breeding years.
or, the question of acting as a role model. i'm side-stepping this; this is not music for children but music for grandparents, so it's just not a meaningful question.
</rant>
i sort of mentally skipped my young adult phase. i was 15 going on 12, and then i was 17 going on 37 and 25 going on 55 and 30 going on 80. one would have to expect a person that matures like that to live a bizarre life, and i have.
the point is that i'm explicitly trying to not appeal to a young audience, which is so unusual in the industry today that it's incomprehensible. to understand certain things, you have to understand that.
but it's maybe something else that we ought to expect the collapse of the market to bring forward. young people have historically paid the most out. that's probably not true anymore, and becoming less true every year.
Wednesday, February 11, 2015
untitled (slow mix)
the slow mix is up...
this is a slower, "ambient" version of the track. mix finalized on feb 10, 2015.
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/track/untitled-slow-mix
the final mix is next, followed by the guitar concerto, which is starting to gain some more shape.
i was hoping to have this done by the end of december. it's currently seeming more like an end of february thing :/. but it takes how long it takes...
this is a slower, "ambient" version of the track. mix finalized on feb 10, 2015.
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/track/untitled-slow-mix
the final mix is next, followed by the guitar concerto, which is starting to gain some more shape.
i was hoping to have this done by the end of december. it's currently seeming more like an end of february thing :/. but it takes how long it takes...
i've made a change, here.
i've been uploading things as i'm done them, and having it update here via rss. so, anybody can hear things the minute they're finished. now, the reality is that none of you are listening to any of it anyways...
...but i've changed this so that uploads are subscriber only until the release is finalized. so, for example, i'm working on this untitled techno tune right now. i've got two more mixes left, i think. there's currently nine mixes up. at the moment, only bandcamp subscribers can access those nine mixes. when i finish the release and publish it, it will be fully accessible for streaming (and purchase) by the general public.
it appears that the rss feed will stop updating these, so i'll have to post them manually. what that means is that i'll be posting a lot of links you won't have access to unless you subscribe. but, eventually, everything will be accessible....
a little taste of the *actual* future of the music industry.
putting the price through the roof like this provides a strong disincentive for file-sharing. also, if file sharing does end up happening, it ensures that the few people that are actually paying are making up for the lost revenue. that's how markets work, and how it's gotta be if people want to just steal shit...
the result is going to be less sales, but a higher price attached to the dwindling sales. and, you're going to see other things happen as a result of that. artists are going to stop focusing on marketing to the masses and start focusing on marketing to the upper middle classes. this should have a positive effect on the quality of the music, but will likely come at a price of social consciousness. that's a balance we're going to need to grapple with.
the reality is that if there is no market in the masses, there will not be a product produced for them. the idea that a decrease in demand will lead to a sustained increase in supply is incoherent. if demand for popular music falls, musicians will seek out other career opportunities. you can't build an industry on the capitalization of pipe dreams.
i've been uploading things as i'm done them, and having it update here via rss. so, anybody can hear things the minute they're finished. now, the reality is that none of you are listening to any of it anyways...
...but i've changed this so that uploads are subscriber only until the release is finalized. so, for example, i'm working on this untitled techno tune right now. i've got two more mixes left, i think. there's currently nine mixes up. at the moment, only bandcamp subscribers can access those nine mixes. when i finish the release and publish it, it will be fully accessible for streaming (and purchase) by the general public.
it appears that the rss feed will stop updating these, so i'll have to post them manually. what that means is that i'll be posting a lot of links you won't have access to unless you subscribe. but, eventually, everything will be accessible....
a little taste of the *actual* future of the music industry.
putting the price through the roof like this provides a strong disincentive for file-sharing. also, if file sharing does end up happening, it ensures that the few people that are actually paying are making up for the lost revenue. that's how markets work, and how it's gotta be if people want to just steal shit...
the result is going to be less sales, but a higher price attached to the dwindling sales. and, you're going to see other things happen as a result of that. artists are going to stop focusing on marketing to the masses and start focusing on marketing to the upper middle classes. this should have a positive effect on the quality of the music, but will likely come at a price of social consciousness. that's a balance we're going to need to grapple with.
the reality is that if there is no market in the masses, there will not be a product produced for them. the idea that a decrease in demand will lead to a sustained increase in supply is incoherent. if demand for popular music falls, musicians will seek out other career opportunities. you can't build an industry on the capitalization of pipe dreams.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)