Saturday, November 22, 2014

there's the monster right there.

that massive file at the bottom is what i've been looking for and what has been confusing me whenever i've tried to do this for years. it's synced perfectly with the rabit version, indicating that it's a clean early mix. the volume captures the shape of the track. i didn't think i could get this perfect, but this is actually, in fact, perfect. hurrah for that...

the big file contains a drum soundscape (i've got roughly 30 components of this - live drums, programmed drums, live drum machine square pushing and digital generated/shaped noises), a bass part, seven guitar parts and two synth parts. so, i could actually conceivably squeeze this onto a 32 track board.

that's synced. i'll mix it in the morning, then it's done.


that file is dated to 2006. i don't remember where it came from; i may have ripped it from a since lost cd-r. i don't know why i didn't rebuild it from this in the first place. it's a long time coming, but it's finally what i wanted it to be....
"i believe that people that are going to commit crimes shouldn't have guns" - george w. bush

this is a quote that was widely thrown around in the mid 00s as supposed evidence of mr. bush's lack of intelligence. i've never really seen the supposed stupidity in the statement. nobody doubts the truth of the statement. it may be a little obvious, but we're talking about an office that declares truths to be self-evident.

i've used it twice - in the unfinished curious george suite, and again in the sample version of the fourth symphony, because i wasn't planning on releasing the curious george suite (and now have). both of these uses preceded it's wide adoption by satirists.

i was taking a different perspective, though. it's one i've never seen anybody else use. i was actually focusing on the irony in the statement.

in fact, mr. bush was somebody that was clearly going to commit crimes. war crimes, as it turns out. therefore, by his own logic, he shouldn't have had guns.

of course, he did. which indirectly circles back around to it's more common satirical usage.

i still find the irony in it staggering. as an american, mr. bush probably didn't pick up on that...

"i believe that wars should not happen unless they are congressionally approved."

it seems like a rather different statement.

but it actually follows logically as a corollary.

that constitution down there is a bit wonky, though.

for all the talk of congressional approval, the reality is that the american form of government is designed to be a military dictatorship. i think that a large amount of the problems down there could be solved by merely grasping this simple point - the president is not meant to be in charge of civilian matters, but the commander in chief. that is, a military leader. and, while congress can act as a check on his power, he's constitutionally not far from being an elected military dictator.

the president can introduce legislation if he wants. and he can veto shit under limited circumstances. but it's not the primary function of the office. civilian things are actually supposed to be dealt with through congress. yet, millions of americans expect the president to set the domestic agenda. then, they get confused when it doesn't happen.

getting people to understand that the president is meant to be somebody that has guns and that they're supposed to deal with things like health care and decriminalization through various representative bodies would shift the focus back to where it needs to be to get things done.

the next step, then, ought to be to take away the president's guns.

but one thing at a time...

replacing symphony 7 on youtube

this is now a discarded mix. there's a lot more information on the single page.

the track was written multiple ways in 2002, but i seem to have avoided saving a completed instrumental version. i've tried to rebuild this instrumental version several times since 2006 and have never got a good result. a large part of the reason for this stems from the mixing strategy i was using at the time i wrote and recorded it, which was to record each part in separately, process it in a wave editor and then literally paste it all together in an editing process. this mixing process is actually responsible for a lot of the blurry mixes i've been able to create over the years (i haven't abandoned it entirely; i go back to it for experimental and ambient pieces), but it doesn't allow for remixing or reconstructing tracks. once i past a part into the file, it cannot be removed or altered without starting all over again.

it's consequently necessary to save mixes at strategic points if you're going to be mixing in this way, and i failed to do that for this track when i added political samples to it in 2002. i've been trying to get the samples out since 2006. this 2009 version was the best thing i could create at the time, without abandoning the mixing strategy. it was built on an early 2002 mix; i ended up pushing the overdubs out of sync, and ruining it with a bad master. i initially didn't think i would be able to resolve this because i couldn't figure out how to get the overdubs back in sync.

however, i've spent the second half of 2014 completing my discography (i lost several months at the beginning of the year due to a bad bios flash. get a bus pirate. they're life savers.) and in the process i've found a proper 2002 mix that is in sync with the final mixes, which has allowed me to reconstruct the file properly in cubase. this best-i-can-do compromise mix is now obsolete.

the new video is available at this link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Azl0LKVr6EU

this is the old video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=658axrUn-7w