jessica
hi again.
the toilet did the same thing after the storm today, so it's really obvious, now.
further,
i checked the back room and it seems to be flooding out of the storage
area beside the laundry room, which my ears tell me is where the sump
pump is.
i noticed when i went out for a smoke that it
was dumping water on the front lawn at a startling rate. like, it looks
like somebody left a faucet running, sort of thing.
again: i have no idea what this means, only that something is flooding and it seems to be connected to the sump pump.
(pause)
actually,
the water in the basement seemed to be coming from a little hole in the
foundation. but if i were to guess, i'd think the cause of it seeping
through would be the massive amount of water coming out of the sump pump
directly above it. i might be concerned that it's producing some water
damage, but it's sort of secondary to the plumbing issue itself.
it's
hard to believe it 's coming from the rain because the puddles on the
rest of the street have already dried up. why is this unit getting a
thousand times more water than the one next door? so, it has to be
feeding back from somewhere.
i just want to be clear
about the flow rate. you know the "outdoor taps" that units used to
have? i haven't seen once since i was a kid, but you'd attach a hose or a
sprinkler to it out of your backyard. it looks like that faucet is on
FULL BLAST. and it's been running like that for an hour. there's
absolutely no way it's just the rain, it didn't even rain that much,
that water has a different source...
with that much
water, i thought maybe it was coming from a pipe that could be turned
off, but it was suggested to me that that doesn't make sense. see, maybe
it doesn't. but the toilet thing doesn't seem to make sense either.
i
don't know what the options on the sanitary line are, or how they could
get mixed up with the storm drain, but something seems to be crossed.
so i need to ask: did the furnace guys connect any pipes together? might it have crossed something up, through back pressure?
(pause)
sorry
for the long email, but, just to finish the thought, it seems like the
water was coming out of the sump pump and back into the basement. so it
was recycling itself, creating the impression that it was coming out at a
steady flow. he put a device in that acts as an inclined plane, to get
the water out from the house and each pump is consequently decreasing in
volume. so, it seems like it's not backed up, after all, it's just that
the ground is really saturated. it might be a good idea to try and make
that permanent to prevent further water damage...
it
doesn't explain the toilets, but i do think the logic extrapolates. if
the water is too saturated in the front of the house, it stands to
reason that the city system is possibly backed up.
i'm still a little skeptical about possible flow issues somewhere, but that's an easy line of thinking to stick with for now.
(or it could have been a coincidence that the pump started slowing when the device was installed)
the landlord
Again
the pump, pumps storm water, it does not pump sewage. If the sewer,
sewage line is backing up we will call the city and report this. Speak
to Paul and explain what you are experiencing so that he can look for
himself when it rains again. This will give him first hand knowledge of
the problem when he speaks to the City. I will speak to Paul and have
him call this to the Public works. This is not are doing this will be a
city correction. If you notice around our building that they have had us
divert the water from the eves draughs out of the storm pipes at the
side of the building. This is so the storms are not overloading,
delaying the run off into the storm sewers from the road surfaces. Paul
you are seeing this e-mail, call me when you get this.
jessica
i
guess that explains where the extra water is coming from. ok. i just
couldn't understand why there was so much on this property, and so
little elsewhere without the water backing up from somewhere. i was
thinking that if a stormwater pipe had broken, it could be flooding both
the sump pit and the sanitary at the same time. but if you're doing it
on purpose, that explains that.
i did a bunch of
googling and i'm still working with a weak understanding of toilet
plumbing but i think it has to be the case that water is pooling
somewhere. it might be a blockage, but if it's a blockage it would have
to be somewhere that water can pool where it rains - through a manhole
or something. this is then killing the air pressure on the flush.
otherwise, it would be slow to drain all the time.
the
other thing i was thinking was about the air vent coming up from the
toilet. if something had been rerouted with the furnace, could it not
possibly have a different reaction to rainwater, and conceivably produce
a lack of flush pressure? but, i did an experiment early in the morning
and i think i've ruled it out. what i did was let the water in the sink
run and then flush. the water was flowing right out through the sink
before i flushed, but as it was flushing it started to fill up a little.
if i understand correctly, this rules out a vent issue by demonstrating
a restriction of the flow rate.
i have to admit that
i'm not entirely convinced it isn't construction. if they're temporarily
down to one pipe somewhere instead of two, that could be where the
water is pooling. i know everybody else in the neighbourhood would have
to experience this, but how many have toilets that are low enough for it
to be an issue?
i'll bring paul down here next time we get a lot of rain...
(pause)
the
only other thing i can think of is that maybe one of the neighbours
recently installed a sump pump to the sanitary and it's exaggerating an
existing block...you're not supposed to that, but people do that...
whether
it's via leak, construction, bad install or whatever else i think the
flow restriction happening only when it rains, and stopping when it's
dried out, demonstrates that there just has to be rainwater blocking the
sanitary at some point, somewhere, somehow - even though that's not
supposed to happen.
but, like i say, i'll get paul down here to see it next time it happens.
(pause)
actually,
there's one more hypothesis i have. i know this is a little bit of a
long shot, but the culmination of what you're telling me and what i'm
reading and what i'm seeing indicates that something very strange is
happening.
the house across the street had a fire last
month. it seems like it's been completely shut down since. if they shut
the sump pump off, the basement could be flooding in the rain, and the
flooding could be finding it's way into the sanitary, slowing the drain
down.
it's just a guess, but something weird like that
MUST be happening. i don't known if you know those guys or could call
them and ask, but i think the sump pump in that basement ought to be
working, regardless, for the benefit of the rest of the
neighbourhood....
Tuesday, August 19, 2014
another thing to take note of...
every video in the first grid, sorted by popularity, now has over 100 views.
it might seem silly to note this on first thought, but it has psychological implications for some people that won't watch something unless it has x amount of hits. now, they don't have to see any videos with two digit view counts. these kinds of people maybe aren't a natural demographic for me, but it's an additive thing...
i uploaded like 70 videos over about three months, which wasn't done with much thought about view count. but what it means is that a lot of the songs are climbing at roughly the same rate, and the rate is relatively slow compared to the overall channel rate. i mean, instead of having those 10,000 hits focused on one or two tracks, they're spread over 70. so, i wouldn't expect that number to hit 200 for at least two more months, and 300 until the end of the year. having that number go from 100 to 300 is 6000 total views, though.
i'm focusing on long term distribution potential, not short term virality, so it's a better argument for me to spread it out. but it takes time...
every video in the first grid, sorted by popularity, now has over 100 views.
it might seem silly to note this on first thought, but it has psychological implications for some people that won't watch something unless it has x amount of hits. now, they don't have to see any videos with two digit view counts. these kinds of people maybe aren't a natural demographic for me, but it's an additive thing...
i uploaded like 70 videos over about three months, which wasn't done with much thought about view count. but what it means is that a lot of the songs are climbing at roughly the same rate, and the rate is relatively slow compared to the overall channel rate. i mean, instead of having those 10,000 hits focused on one or two tracks, they're spread over 70. so, i wouldn't expect that number to hit 200 for at least two more months, and 300 until the end of the year. having that number go from 100 to 300 is 6000 total views, though.
i'm focusing on long term distribution potential, not short term virality, so it's a better argument for me to spread it out. but it takes time...
so, maybe not.
i left my broom to dry in the back room a few weeks ago and forgot about it. i was going to clean today, but not without a broom...
if it doesn't show up by tomorrow, i'll go buy a new broom, i guess. i mean, it's the landlord's broom. but that gives me a few hours to listen to mixes.
i left my broom to dry in the back room a few weeks ago and forgot about it. i was going to clean today, but not without a broom...
if it doesn't show up by tomorrow, i'll go buy a new broom, i guess. i mean, it's the landlord's broom. but that gives me a few hours to listen to mixes.
uploading to spin inside dull aberrations to the scratchpad
i'm going to let this simmer for a day before i get back to it, and spend tomorrow doing other things.
i feel obligated to warn you that the mix is floored with distortion ala loveless or siamese dream, but without any safety precautions that professional mixers might use to prevent hearing damage. you need a substantial amount of volume to get it to sound as i've mixed it, but please don't go overboard for now. i don't want you to damage your hearing.
as for the mix itself, i think i've finally got something close to what i want, but many tweaks are still coming.
i also still need to add some more synth, choir, bass, ebow and possibly some more strings.
http://googledrive.com/host/0B5JfVE9XTZikMS1zek9ER0xSU1E/scratchpad/
i feel obligated to warn you that the mix is floored with distortion ala loveless or siamese dream, but without any safety precautions that professional mixers might use to prevent hearing damage. you need a substantial amount of volume to get it to sound as i've mixed it, but please don't go overboard for now. i don't want you to damage your hearing.
as for the mix itself, i think i've finally got something close to what i want, but many tweaks are still coming.
i also still need to add some more synth, choir, bass, ebow and possibly some more strings.
http://googledrive.com/host/0B5JfVE9XTZikMS1zek9ER0xSU1E/scratchpad/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)