i was diagnosed with chronic bronchitis from exposure to second-hand smoke when i was very young, and it has in fact acted as a trigger for many, many years.
i've periodically needed a puffer.
i haven't been triggered as badly as i could be, but it's because i've
taken so many steps to deal with the issue - steps i've been demanded to
stop, and eventually threatened with eviction over.
but, the actual grounds i'm being discriminated against is on not smoking. i am being treated differently, and the reason is that i don't
smoke. rather than have my concerns addressed, i've been asked to
leave. so, i really want to find an analogous ground argument...
all of the existing precedent for this is in british columbia, so this
is going to be pushing new legal ground in ontario. call me the
trailblazer, here - the pioneer.
i was hoping to get
this done tonight, but spent hours dealing with a termite swarm. it's at
least mostly stopped since i closed one of the six windows in this
place, which they seemed to begetting in through - and w which there are
now dozens of dead termites on.
i'd never seen this
before, but apparently they fly into the lightbulbs, where they
procreate, and their wings fall off. i've killed a handful of queens in
here since i moved in, but i thought they were ants....they're
i'll sleep on
this and see if i can scheme something up in the morning. because i want
to make the point clearer: they are discriminating against me because i
don't smoke, and specifically because i don't smoke marijuana.